The Most Important Factor that Contributes to Evil Doing...

Factors that Contribute to Evil Doing In your view, what is the most important factor that contributes to evil doing and why? What examples from the readings can you find to support your views? Use at least four of the following authors: Arendt, Brecht, Conrad, Engels, Foucault, Freud, Lewis, Orwell, or Sontag. Throughout the history of humanity, humans have committed inconceivable and unthinkable acts of cruelty towards one another. From the brutal wars during the times of the ancient Greeks and Romans, to the modern area of ethnic cleansing and genocide one cannot help but wonder what is the root cause of this evil. Unthinkable numbers of human life has been lost in every corner of the world from the genocides in Armenia and†¦show more content†¦Using the arguments of both Arendt and Orwell I will focus on how the state perpetuated the commission of evil in the imperialist structures. Next I will examine Foucault’s arguments about biopolitics and show how the role of the state in the Eugenics and biopolitics movements of the early 20th century was essential to the commission of evil. Finally I will focus on the Abu Ghraib prison abuses and how the state not only encouraged, but also legalized the torture of prisoners using the writings of both Sontag and Lewis. Before the world witnessed the horrors of the Nazi concentration camps in the mid 1940’s an evil known only as imperialism wrecked havoc upon the â€Å"uncivilized† corners of the world. Imperialism in the most basic sense can be characterized as a policy of extending the control of a nation over foreign territory. The practice of the acquisition of foreign lands â€Å"was born when the ruling class in capitalist production came up against national limitations to its economic expansion† (Arendt 126). In order to stave off the looming economic crisis that consisted of the massive accumulation of wealth in the hands of a few Western powers were forced to acquire foreign colonies as a way of expanding markets and providing the bourgeoisie a place to spend their massively accumulated wealth. Unlike the previous conquests by monarchs in Europe seeking out the largest and most powerful empire, imperialism wasShow MoreRelatedThe Effects Of Occupational Therapy On The Health Of Individuals1422 Words   |  6 PagesOccupational therapy was founded on the principle that participation in meaningful activity is important to the health of individuals. Mental health is very important to the well-being of an individual and those around them. 450 million people experience mental and neurological disorders around the world. These disorders are the leading 5-10 causes of disability worldwide. As services for individuals with mental illness have shifted from the hospital to the community, there has also been a shiftRead MoreCompare And Contrast John Locke And Thomas Hobbes1680 Words   |  7 PagesJohn Locke and Thomas Hobbes are one of the most influential and famous philosophers who both had similar theories but had different conclusions. The two philosophers wrote a discourse â€Å"life in the state of nature† and argued about the government. They both had made important and logical contributions to modern philosophy and opened up political tho ughts which have impacted our world today. During the seventeenth century the thought of political philosophy became a big topic. John Locke and ThomasRead MoreReligion And Its Impact On Society1343 Words   |  6 Pagesthere. But is this idea of rules and regulations enforced by a belief system really helpful to society? In a world without religion would there be less wars, hatred, and discrimination? With so many people involved or affiliated with religion it is important to explore deeper into the negative impact that religion has on society and try to make the world a better place with information that will help all. At a personal level religion fulfills the role of accounting for a lack of knowledge and offeringRead MoreBusiness For The Glory Of God1506 Words   |  7 Pagesfor the important information to be shared with his readers. I agreed with all of his main thoughts, especially when he spoke about his discussion on money and attitudes of the heart; however, there is sig nificant neglect in the area of government regulations throughout the book. In this review I will discuss the good and the neglect. Wayne Grudem starts his book with an introduction to answer the most basic question when it comes to reading this book; â€Å"is business basically good or evil?† (GrudemRead MoreStereotyping, a Necessary Evil1372 Words   |  6 PagesStereotyping, a Necessary Evil Society generates numerous stereotypes this is a fact. Stereotyping is seen in everyday life as well as the class room, work place and court room. As a member of society I engage in stereotyping, not to say I only judge and am judged by others, but I also create my own. Every man has a different path in life witch teaches him his own personal lessons that govern their life. My personal stereotypes are products of my experiences, which I use. Why Society embracesRead MoreSociological Imagination Concept as it Relates to Domestic Violence899 Words   |  4 Pagesthe individual. Which means, there has to be some external factor that has caused an act to take place. For example, someone commits a murder in self-defense. Here the person was forced into committing the act. They had no control over their actions; it was either kill or be killed. This is where the difference between the two lie, one is due to an individuals feelings where as the other is due to another individual or some e xternal factor. This is the foundation of the Sociological ImaginationRead MoreReligion Can Help Society Progress But It Can Also Easily1435 Words   |  6 PagesChinua Achebe’s novel Things Fall Apart, religion is a very dynamic force. In the case of Christianity, the missionaries play a significant role in deciding whether or not their religion will be a force of great good or great suffering. The second factor to consider is the extent to which people, like Nneka, are welcomed within their own communities. If they have enjoyed privileges within Umuofia, they are less likely to simply leave the Igbo religion. However, if, like Nneka, they have had to endureRead MoreThe Significance of Customs in Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe1016 Words   |  4 PagesThe Significance of Customs The definition of custom is a traditional way of behaving or doing something that is specific to a particular society, place, or time. The book Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe focuses on a small community of Igbo people in lower Niger that undergoes a large change. Their village, previously full of solid morals, traditions and religious belief begins to undergo European colonization. The result of this is a loss of old customs and an acquisition of new ones. CustomsRead MoreImmigration Policy : A Desirable Principle For Establishing Immigration Criteria Essay1488 Words   |  6 PagesThroughout American history, immigration policy, as Marcelo Suà ¡rez-Orozco notes, has been driven by the concern of whether or not newly admitted immigrants â€Å"would [be able to] contribute to the American project.† Current US immigration regulations, most notably, the criteria for Green Card eligibility established by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), were drafted with this same fear in mind, and are based off of two principles that may be summarized as: family unification and talent attractionRead MoreShould Abortion Be Legal?1386 Words   |  6 Pagesthere doing the wrong thing with their lives. The personal choice is being taken away from people and is largely an argument based on factors such as a person’s social wellbeing and religious background (BOLCE, L). Along with this â€Å"Factors other than social class and background and religiosity have been identified to be important in the structuring of opinion towards abortion, including political ideology, sex role orientation, and personal morality.† (BOLCE ,L) . Abortion is an important sociological

Achieving Universal Primary Education Saint Madeleine...

Cameron Fearn Ms. Tenney Global Issues 10 December 2015 Achieving Universal Primary Education Saint Madeleine Sophie Barat, foundress of the Society of the Sacred Heart, once said, â€Å"With the pupils... show them that you want to help them acquire a solid and pious education, enhanced by learning, and thus make them happy† (Barat). Barat made it evident that there is a huge impact as a result of education. This impact can be personal in the way that Barat described it as education making people happy to an impact on a society as a whole. It is commonly known that an education allows for a person to improve their life, their social class, and their job. Education also allows for societies to improve and advance. Education and societal advancements are directly related. It is obvious, especially to people who have benefitted from schooling, that an education is absolutely fundamental to a person’s and a society’s successes. Across the world, there are people who may have access to a proper education, but they do not have the proper supplies and tools that they need to benefit from that education. While there have been great strides in reforming education and the lack thereof across the world, much more needs to be done, whether it be in Sub-Saharan Africa or St. Louis, MO, to fully achieve universal primary education. Globally, the United Nations and its partner countries are working to achieve universal primary education, goal two of the Millennium Development Goals. The U.N.

Ap World Midterm Study Guide Free Essays

1. Hinduism- Caste System, Enlightenment, no holy book, no single founder, India, polytheistic, Buddhism- India, no caste system, egalitarian, Siddhartha Gautama, missionaries, Nirvana, Eight fold path, four noble truths, Enlightenment Christianity-Monotheistic, Jesus, Bible, Jerusalem, Missionaries, Heaven and Hell 2. Domestication of Animals, Complex societies, Specialization, Cities, Government, Religion, Record Keeping, Social Classes, Technology 3. We will write a custom essay sample on Ap World Midterm Study Guide or any similar topic only for you Order Now Located near rivers, Agriculture, irrigation, Rulers, social hierarchy, 4. Development of Agriculture and Domestication 5. Democracy, Representative, voting, Senate, ruler 6. Buddhism- Zen Buddhism, Filial Piety, Hinduism-not syncretic Christianity-Catholic, Protestant, Baptist, Lutheran 7. Size, Bureaucracies, Emphasis on Family, Roads, Religions, Han-Confucianism, Rome-Christianity, 8. Nomadic, Clans, Wars over oasis, no central religion, Chiefs of clans, 9. Pray every day towards Mecca, Alms giving, Hajj to Mecca, fasting, Declaration of Faith 10. In Arabian peninsula spread through trade and missionaries, contagious 11. Sense of Unity, peace among the clans, sacred texts were stored 12. Housewives 13. Each invasion caused the capital to move north 14. LEFT BLANK 15. LEFT BLANK 16. Missionaries 17. Started to decline 18. Many were animistic, salt as a substitute for gold 19. Christian, rich due to slaves 20. United the people 21. Arabian Peninsula, Red or Black sea, 22. Barter 23. Major trade routes influenced Kiev Russia 24. Structures, law codes, bureaucracy 25. Patriarch held power, rituals, priest celibacy, orthodox priests could marry, excommunication each other in 1054 26. Similar to china, emperor ordained by god, head of church and state, practiced lay investiture, women eld imperial throne (exe Empress Theodora and Zoe), byzantine bureaucrats recruited from all classes, recruited troops, empire depended on Constantinople 27. Lost land, economic decline, Constantinople fell 28. Social examination, formal 29. Used to regain the holy land, last crusade sacked Constantinople, pope ordered it, increase of trade, established religious capital 30. Lords and vassals, serfs, relied on agriculture, fiefs, 3 field system, technology advancements 31. Religious Leaders- Pope, Bishops, Priests, Pope Urban II, Gregory IV, Literary Leaders- Chaucer, Machiavelli, Thomas Aquinas Philosophical Leaders- Saint Clare, Saint Francis 32. Trade increase, manufacturing, territorial gain, 33. both had slaves, West Africa relied on Hunting and gathering, South America had agriculture, 34. Disease, gunpowder 35. Peasants, kings 36. Wars, trade, military 37. Indians, hunter gatherer 38. Aztecs conquered the toltecs 39. Anti-Buddhist, rejected 40. Status of women decreased 41. Unification by Wendi, ended famine, lowered taxes, Yang Di overworked peasants 42. Better examination system, paper money, plow, grand canal, junk ships 43. Male dominance, revival of Confucianism 4. Both had a bureaucracy and examination exam, Chinese had a dynastic succession, Europeans had a fight for power, in china empresses are possible, 45. Peasants reduced to serfdom, over worked, 46. Yi, Koryo, Silla 47. Manorial System, everyone had an important society, 48. Military Elites eventually became part of the imperial court 49. Dynasties, all modeled after Chinese except for Vietnam 50. Women w ere almost equal to men, herded a lot, warlike 51. Golden Horde-affected Russia Empire of Kublai Khan-China Ilkhan- Persia Djagatai –central Asia 52. Mongols cut Russia off, inhibited culture and technology, Mongols destroyed the Islamic heartland 53. Tumens 1k cavalries 54. Harsh, no prosperity, short-lived, smaller conquests 55. Clothing, Arabians spread religion to Indians, Arabs spread technology to Europe, Europeans wanted to trade with India 56. Peasant uprisings, high taxes, abuse of power, Mongol threat, economic decline 57. Increase trade, conquest, Portuguese freed Ethiopians from Islam 58. Increased influence through the arts, Enlightenment, Literature by Machiavelli and others 59. Disease, slave trade, fall of many civilizations 60. Technology, Animals, Leadership, Conquest 61. World Trade, Slaves 62. Decreased population, Inflation, Competition 63. Guns, Boats, Technology 64. Core Area-main area of power in country, Dependent Zone- are dependent on core areas 65. Australia, 66. God doesn’t influence life, people control their own life 67. Based on scientific findings, god wasn’t involved 68. Against sacraments, against priest celibacy, protested against the Catholics, 30 years war, more conflicts, 69. Sell more than you buy, everyone tried to sell their wares 70. Louis the XIV suppressed the nobility, gained all the power, spread around 71. Russia had a smaller economy, Russia was technologically limited, Russia was bigger, exerted more power 72. Tsar suppressed the local nobility 73. Westernization, too much imports, not enough exports 74. Brutal, overworked, not advanced in technology, 75. Serfdom in Russia, Slaves in Western Europe, absolute monarchies in both 76. Militaristic, White, strong leadership, imperialistic 77. Discovery of gold and silver, inflation 78. Plantations, slaves, 79. Imaginary North to South line, separates Spanish and Portuguese colonies 80. Based on plantations, silver mining, slave trade 1. Replaceable, easy to attain, cheap, complimentary industries flourished 82. Gun slave trade, internal strife, dominance, War for slaves 83. Set up ports, applied own rules, controlled coast, supplied arms, 84. Common sense 85. Decrease in males, increase in polygamy, decrease in labor 86. Powerful, lots of land, Good government, 87. A bigot, 88. Internal strife, Isma’il took power 89. Under safavids treated poorly, under the ottomans treated well 90. Cared less about the dynasties progress and more over the arts, 91. Difference-religion, Similarity- education and learning, How to cite Ap World Midterm Study Guide, Papers

Developing management skills free essay sample

By reading the Southfield Case, one can quickly realize that there is definitely lack of direct communication and goal expectations between both Mark Sanders, Vp of account services and Frank Belby, Reginald manager. I believe, there was a lack of supportive communication between Mark and Frank since in the case it was mentioned that Belby viewed professional guidance from Sanders as threatening and it usually caused Belby to distance himself from Frank, which it negatively resulted production. Based on the reading of chapter four of Developing Management Skills, there is a fine line between coaching and counseling and it is extremely challenging for managers to effectively perform both and in the same time make sure that they are not directly ignoring the other persons feelings and confidence. When Frank needed professional advice or when professional criticism was required, instead he mostly got coaching instead of counseling, which resulted in the distance relationship between them, which frank interpreted as a criticism attack on his character. We will write a custom essay sample on Developing management skills or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Furthermore, we also learn that in one incident Mark had intervened in a problematic situation between Frank and one of his customers and was able to save that clients contract. By not allowing Frank to resolve the situation, Mark is stretching his duties far too thin and does not allow other employees to delegate effectively, which results in low productivity over all. Based on chapter four readings, the best relationships are based on congruence, which one cannot really find between Mark and Frank’s relationship. Frank is not being clear about his expectations from Mark. It was mentioned in the case that Frank didn’t get the promotion partially because he never directly communicated to frank that he wanted the promotion.

Heart Disease Essay Research Paper William Blake free essay sample

Heart Disease Essay, Research Paper William Blake s verse form, The Poison Tree, states the footing of morality in its simplest signifier. Blake takes one of the toughest emotions there is to cover with choler, and blends it with the convicting power of Christianity. The cogent evidence lies in the first stanza, I was angry with my friend: / I told my wrath, my wrath did end./ I was angry with my enemy: / I told it non, my wrath did turn. In the Bible, God tells his people let non the Sun go down upon your wrath ( Ephesians 4:26 ) . The talker of the verse form avoids making what he knows is right ; alternatively, he makes his ain way, which leads to evil. William Blake s usage of words, along with the rime strategy and symbolism portray the true nature of adult male. Blake instantly displays the footing of the verse form in the rubric: A Poison Tree. We will write a custom essay sample on Heart Disease Essay Research Paper William Blake or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In Matthew 7, God speaks of his kids bearing fruit. He says, why by their fruits ye shall cognize them ( Matthew 7:20 ) . Man is the tree, and his actions are his fruits. The talker instantiously does two things incorrectly within the first stanza: he harbors his choler, which in bend, workss the seed for a corrupt tree. The simple rhyme strategy shock absorbers in the growth of the tree. Friend/end implies that the good spirit of the talker has diminished, while foe/grow foreshadows what is approximately to come. The talker has abandoned his walk with God in exchange for worldly fulfillment. The choler takes root in the 2nd stanza. First, the frights and cryings H2O the seed forenoon and dark. Then, his fallacious smilings provide the sunshine. The rhyme strategy, once more, pounds the emotions into the reader s head: fears/tears, smiles/wiles. It is cagey how Blake continues to label his choler it throughout the verse form. It gives the reader the leeway to visualize the choler as a n existent image, the immature tree. The maturating tree grows quickly in the undermentioned stanza, twenty-four hours and dark. The choler is devouring the talker until he eventually concocts a program, which bores the first fruit. Blake chooses an apple, a animal fruit, to portray the talker s feelings at this clip. A bright apple to be exact. Why bright? Has the talker had an epiphany? Has he come to footings with his morality and figured out a manner to pacify his fury? Obviously so, because his opposition can lay eyes on its radiance, and know that it is the talker s. At this point in the verse form, the talker has had some type of bad luck with a enemy, has fearfully cried over it, and has now figured out a manner to acquire back at it ( or him ) . In the concluding stanza, the talker s wrath blooms into full position. The enemy has is killed, though the manner is non clear. He is glad to see the opposition s organic structure outstretched beneath the tree. The tree of wrath has eventually put forth the immorality fruit which the Bible promised it would. In Matthew 7:17, the Bible says, Even so every good tree bringeth away good fruit ; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. The talker forsakes the Godhead, and his true fruits are exposed. The fruits of the tree are deceit, and the true nature of the tree is revealed by the rage that carries out the horrific act. Guilt has no topographic point in the bosom of this adult male. He can easy see the tree which sprouted from one bad idea. Why does Blake utilize the symbol of a tree to convey his message? Because God uses trees in assorted fables. All trees appear to be beautiful on the outside, but on the interior they contain insects, gnawers, and dust. The tree serves as a perfect reproduction of the human psyche. It goes through legion emotions ( frights, cryings, smilings, etc. ) , merely as the tree matures in assorted phases.

The Public Opinion of the Citizens of the USA

The Public Opinion of the Citizens of the USA Introduction Public opinion is considered to be extremely important in the modern world. It is impossible to imagine a democratic country which does not pay attention to the public opinion in the relation to a specific affair which concerns the whole society. Many different models have been used to make conclusions about the relation of the public opinion to the specific parameters and events in the society.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The Public Opinion of the Citizens of the USA specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More To consider this problem, a specific situation should be taken into account. One of the most crucial questions which has been bothering not only the USA but also the whole world is the problem devoted to the war in Iraq. Different people have various points of view regarding the situation. It is important to state the personal opinions of people in different years have been changing. It may be predicted that the reasons for change in the public opinion are different, starting with those which have relation to the USA and the actions which are taken there and finishing with the actions which take place on the international arena and influence of the war on other spheres of the world life. The main purpose of this article is to consider the public opinion of the citizens of the USA which has been changing from one year to another which are gathered in polls and review and analyzes those public opinion polls about the importance of the attitude public preference of citizens toward a specific public policy. Iraq war polls Public preference in thermostatic model According to Soroka (2010) â€Å"the representation of the public opinion presupposes that the public actually notices and responds to what policy makers do† (22). Thus, from the first words it is seen that the actions taken by the government and the documents they accept as the legal influence public opinion. The change of the public preference may change either to the positive or negative opinion, like a thermostat. Thus, the model which dwells upon the change of public opinion as a result of the changes the policymakers do is called thermostatic. The public preference for policy is different in different regions of the USA as the public preferred level is different as well. People pay much attention to the laws and different policies which are accepted in the society, but at the same time people do not have the copies of those documents in their houses. Most people create their personal opinion on the basis of the public opinion and form their preference on the basis of the public preference. These processes are interconnected.Advertising Looking for essay on political culture? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More People are not predicted to have detailed information about the event as well as they are not predicted to have a stated an d perfectly formulated opinion about some specific fact. Public is also not predicted to be aware of different actions held by the policy makers. The only thing which is required is the changes of the public preference to the specific occasion with the change of some actions. Public opinion may become either negative or positive with the change either to the less or to more public preference. Soroka (2010) has proven that the policy reacts to the policy change even though people do not read the entire documents or do not present while the specific events. The information flow plays an important role in the thermostatic model as it makes it possible for people to get to know something about the changes and identify their personal attitude to the change either positive or negative. It may be stated that public creates its opinion not on the basis of the credible information they get from numerous sources, but on the basis of the feedback. Depending on the nature of the feedback, eithe r positive or negative, public preference becomes either lower or higher. But, even when a positive feedback is got, public opinion may change in different ways, either favorably or less supportive. The behavior of the political elites may become crucial in the decision. When the opinion is created, public has an opportunity to response to the specific event and policy which had been accepted. There are two main ways for public response to the policy, namely elections (indirect) and the response of the politicians to the desires of the public (direct). These two kinds of public responses are closely related. People are not really interested in the way how their desires are going to be met. They just want to respond express their opinion, response to the government reaction and get what they want. Thus, the theoretical information considered above may be easily related to the poll results about the war in Iraq and public opinion was created by mans of different information and feedba ck as well as the public preference changed with the change of the situation and policies.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The Public Opinion of the Citizens of the USA specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Public opinion in different years Dwelling upon public opinion about the war in Iraq in different years, it should be stated that the information has slight differences depending on the poll. The margin of error should be considered as  ± 3 which corresponds to the norm. Thus, here are the results considered by different research centers in different years in the relation to the war in Iraq. According to CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll, 74%of Americans thought that it was a right decision to start a military campaign in Iraq. 41% of people think the same in 2006. According to Gallup poll, 23% of Americans consider a war in Iraq as a mistake in the beginning of 2003 while at the end of 2010 this number has incr eased significantly and now comprises about 55% of American population. It should be noted that public opinion changed and public preference became less with some specific event, like tortures by US military, bombing of Golden Mosque in Samarra, surge and the beginning of presidential primaries (‘Big mistake’ 2010). All these events negatively influenced public preference to the war in Iraq. The reaction of public in the relation to the staying of American troops in Iraq has been changing as well. In 2003 64% of Americans supported the idea to stay in Iraq until the situation there is stabilized. Only 47% of Americans thought the same in 2008 (‘Public Attitudes toward the War in Iraq’ 2008). According to the research of NBC News/Wall Street Journal, 31% of Americans supported the additional sending of 21,500 troops to Iraq in 2007. His says that the general appreciation of the war is reduced. More and more people begin to think that it is impossible to impl ement democracy in the country and there is no need to stay there, otherwise, the USA has some different reasons to send more troops to Iraq and stay there as long as possible.Advertising Looking for essay on political culture? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The attitude of public to financial problems has not changed much. According to the results of ABC News/Washington Post (2009) in 2007 40% of respondents considered it financially profitable; in 2009 only 39% thought that the war worth those financial costs. Comparison and contrast of public opinion in different years Having considered numerous polls related to the public opinion about the Iraq War since 2003 up to present times, it has been found out that it was changing. According to the summary of the poll provided by the USA Today, Benedetto (2003) states that people in the USA supported the fighting which began in Iraq. â€Å"The news from Iraq is mostly bad, and criticism of President Bush from Democrats is relentless. But nearly two-thirds - 63% - of Americans say the war in Iraq was worth fighting† (Benedetto 2003). The information in the polls states that in January about 53% of respondents said that the situation was worth going to war and in August this number in creased up to 63% (USATODAY/CNN/Gallup poll results 2005). The positive opinion about the war during this period may be explained by the public mood. The events of September 11, 2001 were still fresh in mind. The inability to apply democracy in Iraq and to avoid blind submission to the desire of one specific person were also important for the Americans as the nation which respected democracy most of all. The promotion of the idea of the war also influenced the population in the USA. Moreover, the idea of the war against terrorism was proclaimed. Providing the research in 2005, the following results were considered. 41% stated that the war was a right thing and 55% of respondents wanted American troops stayed out in Iraq. At the same time 59% of respondents stated that the war did not worth its costs. According to another statistics 64% sated that financial profitableness of the war was not confirmed. It is possible to conclude that people reconsidered something, the policies which w ere adopted and the actions which were taken made some people realize that the war was not exactly what was happening. The public preference reduced, still, the change was not so great, more people still considered the war a right action (Roberts 2005). Furthermore, the referendum was expected at that time and most Americans did not consider Iraq secure enough to take it up. All these policies and events influenced the public preference. People began to understand that the inability of the USA to lead a quick war influenced them directly. The financial costs were really great and the USA could not state firmly that they would be able to reach their purposes. Thus, it is possible to conclude that Americans wanted for the Iraq war to finish as soon as possible in 2005, while in 2003 it was impossible to state that the USA would have this opinion in the nearest future. Considering the data collected while 2007, it may be noticed that â€Å"Americans now view the war in Iraq more negat ively than at any time since the invasion more than four years ago† (Sussman 2007). Considering the statistical information, only 35% of respondents considered the war in Iraq a right thing, others believed that it was a mistake. 47% of Americans were sure that the efforts the US government provided were useless. Bush had sent troops to Iraq in 2007, but 51% of Americans said that this was useless. Those troops could not change anything but the financial support of the war increased. Furthermore, Americans began to say about the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq as one of the most reasonable decision the president could make. Only 20% of respondents saw the positive effect of the increase of the US troops in the USA. The financing of the war was the main problem which made the public opinion change. 15% of the respondents were for blocking the financing of the war by Congress. 62% thought that the Congress should allow the war, but â€Å"on the condition that the United State s sets benchmarks for progress and the Iraqi government meets those goals† (Sussman 2007). Thus, it may be concluded that the change in public opinion was influenced by a number of different reasons. The change of the situation in Iraq influenced the inner situation in the USA. Public preference changed but this change was slight. It can be seen that about a half of respondents were either for or against the war in Iraq. Human opinion was formed under the influence of the situation in the whole world. People acted according to the thermostatic model when people got to know about the situation in Iraq and their opinion changed. Depending on the actions taken in the country, the public got to know the latest news and its preferences changed as well. The importance of public preference while collecting public opinion The reduction of the war support from 2003 up to 2005 may be easily explained. The fall of support began when people began to understand that the financial stability of the country may be ruined. Financing the war, the federal deficit increased. More than a half of respondents (62%) would better finance the Gulf Coast rebuilding rather than the war which outcome seemed rather unpredictable. Americans did not believe that it was possible to build stable democracy in that country (Roberts 2005). Thus, people began to criticize the war and the preference to it reduced. Public was dissatisfied with the situation and this led to the reduction of public support of the war. Public preference to the specific event is important as it influenced public opinion about the situation. The beginning of the Presidential primaries was one of the most influential events which influenced public opinion. It should be mentioned that it reduced the interest to the war in general. Many people began to be less interested in what had happened there. The Presidential primaries provoked the debates as each candidate wanted to refer his/her election campaign to the situat ion in Iraq. It is obvious that the debates made many people think about what had happened there, for some people more and more new information revealed. Many facts about the situation in Iraq were dwelt upon in the daily newspapers According to Soroka (2010), most Americans do not read newspapers, but this does not prevent them from form public preference e and remain responsiveness to the policy. The author is sure that one of the main components of public preference is â€Å"whether policy has gone ‘too far’ in one direction or ‘not far enough’† (Soroka 2010, 31). To give such an opinion is possible even without being aware of the detailed facts about the policy or vents. Thus, public preference is created on the basis of the superficial knowledge. This knowledge makes it possible to formulate public opinion. Returning to the practical example which has been considered along the whole paper, the preference to the war in Iraq was ether less of more during different periods of time. This influenced public opinion and in different times more or less people supported the war or considered it to be a mistake. The Economist in 2010 had provided a research with the purpose to consider when public opinion was more preferable to the war in Iraq and when the situation was less positive. When the president Bush declared about the end of the major combat operations in Iraq, the public thought that it was not a mistake (76 %). When the reports about the tortures by the US military came to the USA, the public opinion changed and the preference to the war reduced, only 66% of Americans still believed that this war was not a mistake. With the bombing of Golden Mosque in Samarra, public opinion about the war began to get stable in the idea that the USA should not have to attack Iraq. Public preference to the war reduced and 65%believed that the war in Iraq was a great mistake. The Presidential primaries revealed much information and public p reference to the war was even less than before, only 40% were sure that the war was not a mistake (‘Big mistake’ 2010). Thus, referencing to Soroka and the thermostatic model of public preference, it may be concluded that public opinion is really important in the situation. â€Å"Without public responsiveness to policy, there is little basis for policy responsiveness to public opinion† (Soroka 2010, 41), but public responsiveness to the policy is an obligatory condition for the existence of the society. People got used to the fact that they have their opinion about some specific situation. Each American had an opinion about the war in Iraq and the responsiveness to that event created the public opinion and changed public preference either to less or more. Conclusion In conclusion, the thermostatic model states that public preference reacts to the changes in the public opinion which is formed on the basis of different policies and events which take place. It shoul d be mentioned that the information flow is really important as many Americans are not interested in detailed study of legal documents and reports about the events. Being aware of the general facts devoted to the problem people create their opinion which influenced public preference. The attitude to the war in Iraq changed with the occurrence of different events. When Americans thought that the war was fast and desired goal to make this country democratic were almost reached, the preference to the war increased, but when the war had been lasting for several years and the desired goal was too far, public preference to the war, influenced by the negative public opinion reduced as well. The poll results presented by different research campaigns showed that the change of the public preference was influenced by different events, both inside the country and outside. It was obvious that public got to know about different events later and their opinion changed greatly with the change of tho se events. The nature of the events caused either public satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the war in Iraq and made public preference become either less or more. Reference List ‘ABC News/Washington Post.† 2009. Opinion Polls/Surveys, January 16, http://usiraq.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000673#I.A. Benedetto, Richard. 2003. â€Å"Most say Iraq war was worth fighting.† USA Today, August27, usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-08-27-poll-usat_x.htm . â€Å"Big mistake.† 2010. The Economist. August 31, economist.com/node/16930683 . â€Å"Iraq.† 2011. CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll, January 31, pollingreport.com/iraq.htm . â€Å"NBC News/Wall Street Journal.† 2009. Opinion Polls/Surveys, March 11, http://usiraq.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000673#I.E. â€Å"Public Attitudes Toward the War in Iraq: 2003-2008.† 2008. PewResearchCenter Publications, March 19, http://pewresearch.org/pubs/770/iraq-war-five-year-anni versary . Roberts, Joel. 2005. â€Å"Poll: Fading support for Iraq war.† CBSNEWS, October 10, cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/10/opinion/polls/main930772.shtml . Soroka, Stuart Neil and Christopher Wlezien. 2010. Degrees of democracy: politics, public opinion, and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sussman, Dalia. 2007. â€Å"Poll shows view of Iraq war is most negative since start.† The New York Times, May 25, nytimes.com/2007/05/25/washington/25view.html?_r=1 . â€Å"USATODAY/CNN/Gallup poll results.† 2005. USA Today, May 20, usatoday.com/news/polls/tables/live/0827.htm . Appendix Appendix 1 Do you favor or oppose the U.S. war in Iraq? (CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll in ‘Iraq’ 2011) Favor Oppose Unsure % % % 1/21-23/11 33 66 1 9/1-2/10 34 65 2 8/6-10/10 31 69 1 5/21-23/10 36 62 1 1/22-24/10 39 60 1 11/13-15/09 36 62 2 6/26-28/09 34 64 2 5/14-17/09 34 65 1 4/3-5/09 35 63 1 2/18-19/09 31 67 2 12/1-2/08 36 63 1 10/30-11/1/08 33 64 3 10/17-19/08 32 66 1 10/3-5/08 34 65 9/5-7/08 37 61 2 8/29-31/08 35 64 1 8/23-24/08 33 66 1 7/27-29/08 33 66 1 6/26-29/08 30 68 2 6/4-5/08 30 68 1 4/28-30/08 30 68 3 3/14-16/08 32 66 2 2/1-3/08 34 64 2 1/14-17/08 34 63 3 1/9-10/08 33 65 3 12/6-9/07 31 68 1 11/2-4/07 31 68 1 10/12-14/07 34 65 2 9/7-9/07 34 63 4 8/6-8/07 33 64 3 6/22-24/07 30 67 3 5/4-6/07 34 65 1 4/10-12/07 32 66 2 3/9-11/07 32 63 4 1/11/07 31 67 2 12/15-17/06 31 67 2 11/17-19/06 33 63 4 11/3-5/06 33 61 6 10/27-29/06 38 59 3 10/20-22/06 34 64 3 10/13-15/06 34 64 2 10/6-8/06 32 62 7 9/29-10/2/06 38 61 1 9/23-24/06 40 59 1 8/30 9/2/06 39 58 2 8/18-20/06 35 61 3 8/2-3/06 36 60 3 6/14-15/06 38 54 8 Appendix 2 (New York Times/CBS News poll in Sussman 2007) Did the USA do the right thing in taking military action against Iraq? Did the right thing 35% Should have stayed out 61% How are things going for the U.S. i n its efforts to bring stability and order to Iraq? Very badly 47% Somewhat badly 29% Somewhat well 21% Very well 2% Appendix 3 USATODAY/CNN/Gallup poll results 2005 All in all, do you think the situation in Iraq was worth going to war over, or not? Worth going to war Not worth going to war No opinion 2003 Aug 25-26 63 35 2 2003 Jul 25-27 63 34 3 2003 Jul 18-20 63 35 2 2003 Jun 27-29 56 42 2 2003 Apr 14-16 73 23 4 2003 Apr 9 76 19 5 2003 Apr 7-8 67 30 3 2003 Mar 24-25 68 29 3 2003 Jan 3-5 53 42 5 How would you say things are going for the U.S. in Iraq now that the major fighting has ended – very well, moderately well, moderately badly, (or) very badly? Very well Moderately well Moderately badly Very badly No opinion 2003 Aug 25-26 6 44 30 19 1 2003 Jul 25-27 10 46 28 15 1 2003 Jul 18-20 6 48 30 15 1 2003 Jun 27-29 5 51 29 13 2 2003 May 30-Jun 1 11 59 22 7 1 2003 May 5-7 30 56 10 3 1 2003 Apr 22-23 21 64 12 2 1 Appendix 4 NBC News/Wall Street Journal (Mar. 2-5, 2007) In general, do you approve or disapprove of the job that George W. Bush is doing in handling the situation in Iraq? Date Approve Disapprove Unsure Mar. 2-5, 2007 27% 67% 6% Mar. 10-13, 2006* 35% 61% 4% May 12-16, 2005* 44% 52% 4% Do you favor or oppose the decision to send an additional 21,500 troops to Iraq? Favor Oppose Unsure 31% 63% 6% Appendix 5 ABC News/Washington Post 2009 All in all, considering the costs to the United States versus the benefits to the United States, do you think the war with Iraq was worth fighting, or not? Date Worth It Not Worth It Unsure Jan. 16, 20091 39% 61% 1% Jan. 12, 20081 35% 64% 2% Jan. 10, 2007 40% 58% 2% Appendix 6 (‘Big mistake’ 2010) Appendix 7 CBS in Roberts 2005 Did U.S. do the right thing going to war with Iraq? Now Feb. 2005 Sept. 2004 July 2004 March 2004 Dec. 2003 March 2003 Right thing 41% 46% 54% 45% 58% 63% 69% Should have stayed out 55% 50% 39% 47% 37% 31% 25%

Final Exam Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Final Exam - Essay Example For instance, Paley advanced the company’s business plan by improving its associate relationships where unlike its rival NBC who paid affiliates for every sponsored show they carried out, CBS gave out its sustaining programs free of charge as long as the station could run each sponsored show; hence increasing the number of affiliates and as well as the company’s profits. Prior to increasing the number of its affiliates and making profits, CBS also transformed its presentations by inventing a system for color television, an aspect that made the company progress by acquiring many viewers (Hart, 2004). In addition, Paley changed the general perspective of the recording industry, filmmaking, publishing, and other sections in the media industry. Ideally, Radio was the backbone of CBS in the early 1950s and as television network gradually took over, the radio stars and programs migrated to the new medium. This was the point through which Paley changed the way he run the compa ny because the workload and responsibilities of watching over both the radio and television business and at the same time beat the rival NBC turned out to be a challenging task. Therefore, with an aim of curbing the huge tasks ahead, Paley appointed Frank Stanton to help out, while Paley concentrated on improving the new acquired television network (Rogers, 2000). The efforts evidently yielded positive fruits because Paley managed to improve the newly acquired the newly acquired television network. At this point the CEO invented the color television system and went further to improve the general television network business by erecting two towers of power where one stood for entertainment while the other tower dealt with the news. In general, CBS move from radio to television changed Paley’s personality and career because the event set a platform for him to prove his expertise in the industry; hence, ranking him among the great inventors of the modern technology. How American television has changed the way it represents women for the better in current times Unlike in the past, the current American television has changed the way women are represented because women in the past were supposed to be submissive, get married, keep a home, give birth, and look after the children while the man went out to work and dominate the society (Donaldson, 2012). However, the current woman as depicted by the television is quite different looking at the obvious example of women like Oprah Winfrey, Diane Sawyer, and Tyra Banks. The current women as represented by the American television are independent, single, and hold a strong and positive position in the society. For instance, the movies produced between 1990 to date depict women competing in the political arena and their involvement in the corporate world where they work as CEOs, the movies also show women in the battlefield as armies among other progressive posts. This means that contrary to the past where media degrade d women, it is currently promoting women personal rights and their careers (Donaldson, 2012). Prior to the current movies, the soap opera in the current American television greatly promotes women by presenting their personal issues like relationships and the domestic setting where the woman shares equal responsibilities in the society just like men. In these soap operas, the television presents educated women who choose the